How do party systems shape insurgency levels? A comparison of four nineteenth-century Latin American republics
Social Science History.
This article explores how variations in party systems shape the intensity of insurgency against national authorities in nineteenth-century Latin America. I argue that, under certain conditions, two-party systems may polarize and lead to intense insurgency because they simplify the process of blame attribution, encourage the incumbent party to exclude its opponent from power positions, and motivate leaders to emphasize extreme ideological positions. Conversely, multiparty systems may encourage flexible electoral and congressional alliances among parties, resulting in lower insurgency. I test the argument in four nineteenth-century Latin American republics with different insurgency levels. While in Colombia and Uruguay two-party systems polarized and fueled intense insurgency across the century, Chile and Costa Rica developed flexible multiparty systems that prevented polarization and favored low insurgency.
How to cite this article
Nicolás M. Somma (2016). How Do Party Systems Shape Insurgency Levels? A Comparison of Four Nineteenth-Century Latin American Republics. Social Science History, 40, pp 219-245. doi:10.1017/ssh.2016.2.
Regulaciones públicas y explotación de renta de suelo: el boom inmobiliario de Ñuñoa, Santiago, 2000-2010agosto 25, 2015
Autores/Authors: Ernesto López-Morales, Daniel Meza Resumen Esta investigación presenta un análisis de la renovación urbana del área de Irarráza...Seguir leyendo
A New Poblador Is Being Born: Housing Struggles in a Gentrified Area of Santiagonoviembre 16, 2016
Latin American Perspectives. 2016. Miguel Pérez A. Abstract Since the early 1990s, Chilean democratic governments after Augusto Pinochet’s dictator...Seguir leyendo