How do party systems shape insurgency levels? A comparison of four nineteenth-century Latin American republics
Social Science History.
This article explores how variations in party systems shape the intensity of insurgency against national authorities in nineteenth-century Latin America. I argue that, under certain conditions, two-party systems may polarize and lead to intense insurgency because they simplify the process of blame attribution, encourage the incumbent party to exclude its opponent from power positions, and motivate leaders to emphasize extreme ideological positions. Conversely, multiparty systems may encourage flexible electoral and congressional alliances among parties, resulting in lower insurgency. I test the argument in four nineteenth-century Latin American republics with different insurgency levels. While in Colombia and Uruguay two-party systems polarized and fueled intense insurgency across the century, Chile and Costa Rica developed flexible multiparty systems that prevented polarization and favored low insurgency.
How to cite this article
Nicolás M. Somma (2016). How Do Party Systems Shape Insurgency Levels? A Comparison of Four Nineteenth-Century Latin American Republics. Social Science History, 40, pp 219-245. doi:10.1017/ssh.2016.2.
The relation between prosociality and self-esteem from middle-adolescence to young adulthoodmayo 17, 2014
Personality and Individual Differences. 2014. Authors: Antonio Zuffianò, Guido Alessandri, Paula Luengo Kanacri, Gian Vittorio Caprara. Abstrac...Seguir leyendo
Introduction: Quality of employment in Latin Americaseptiembre 30, 2015
Autores/Authors: José Antonio Ocampo, Kirsten SehnbruchSeguir leyendo